These provisions use to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, regardless of whether the transaction occurred previous to its promulgation. Read more
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents in the boy or girl don't approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they are able to Reduce off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only completed In case the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded on the allegations as such they were properly aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Evidently distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion involves a shift into a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, to the other hand, delivers financial relief by putting an employee within a higher pay back scale, without altering their career duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained inside the same pay scale for a protracted time, particularly when they lack options for promotion. Upgradation is a policy Resource used to ease the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the decreased courts of record, in that they cannot access out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the decreased courts.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load given to any reported judgment may perhaps rely upon the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[7]
In the event you find an error inside the material of the published opinion (such as a misspelled name or simply a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over the same form of case.
five hundred,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) each as well as the same shall read more be stored from the police station on the effect that no harm shall be caused to the petitioners. 5. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation within the police, and they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its different pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are necessary to protect instead of abduct. Read more
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include things like all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the realized counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.